- Middle site
- 91
- Ahead by
- 9
Full marks1 in 10 ranked sites have them
sendhq.cc
Top 50%of the 263,590 sites mttr has read, at #75,696
It scores 84.
A score says pages are well formed. It does not say an assistant cites the site.
Add a tap-to-call link
84 now90 with itTop 25% from 85
#75,696to#25,80649,890 places up100 of its 100 pages fail it. 1 in 3 ranked sites pass it.
Share
LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
FacebookShare on Facebook
The link
Anonymous
The cardSave the card
EmailWrite the email
Where it ranks
Up 3,726 places since Oct 20, from #79,422. 1 point takes it into the top quarter.
Beside it on the board
- #75,694windycitygridiron.com84
- #75,695mavsmoneyball.com84
- #75,696sendhq.cc84
- #75,697fsns.com84
- #75,698bostonconcretefloorcoatings.com84
8,604 sites score 84. A tie goes to the site with faster, leaner pages that say more and keep improving.
To the top quarter
- 84Now#75,696
- 90Add a tap-to-call linkTop 25%
1 fix. Top 25% starts at 85.
Where it stands
Each stage against the middle site. It trails on Trust.
- Middle site
- 59
- Ahead by
- 14
Worth the mostAnswer the first question right under it+2
- Middle site
- 98
- Behind by
- 7
Worth the mostShow sources on guides+1
- Middle site
- 57
- Level with it
Worth the mostAdd a tap-to-call link+6
Against a typical site
The readThis siteTypicalAgainst typical
Pages read1004456 more than typical
Links a page40133.1× typical
Words a page9073942.3× typical
Rules failing somewhere1514About typical
Half its pages answer in30 ms210 ms86% faster than typical
This siteWorse than typicalTypical, the middle ranked site, worked out each hour
The work, worth the most first
15 fixes. The first 5 are worth the most; each group says the places it lifts the site, counted from where every ranked site scores now.
FixIts pages that fail it, fewer is betterSites passing
Worth 6 points49,890 places up
Add a tap-to-call linkAct100 of 1001 in 3
Worth 2 points21,464 places up
Answer the first question right under itUnderstand74 of 1001 in 121
Worth 1 point each13,312 places up each
Add real images to contentUnderstand75 of 1002 in 3
Put figures in tablesUnderstand68 of 1001 in 28
Show sources on guidesTrust27 of 1001 in 2
Show 10 more fixes
Worth under a point each
Make near-copy pages distinctTrustAbout the whole site4 in 5
Phrase headings as questionsUnderstand27 of 1001 in 10
Set a share imageUnderstand97 of 1002 in 7
Add depth to thin pagesUnderstand15 of 1003 in 7
Add lists or tablesUnderstand20 of 1001 in 2
Add breadcrumb dataUnderstand27 of 1001 in 2
Fix description lengthsUnderstand13 of 1001 in 11
Add structured dataUnderstand4 of 1001 in 3
Fix title lengthsUnderstand1 of 1001 in 6
Describe imagesUnderstand1 of 1002 in 7
How AI reads this site
The first words an assistant reads on its home page.
What an assistant reads first
Home pageWhat it says
TitleEmail API for Developers and AI Agents | SendHQ
DescriptionSend and receive transactional email with SendHQ's developer-first API. Verify domains, track delivery events, route inbound mail, and use scoped API keys.
First headingEverything you run.One email API.
OpeningAdd every domain. Give each product, service, and AI agent its own inbox and sending identity. Send, receive, and manage every email use case from one beautifully simple workspace.
1 change so it reads plainly as what it is
- Name Houston in the first words
The site is in Houston, and its title, description, first heading and opening never say so. Questions to assistants often name a place.
Agent instructions
On sendhq.cc, name Houston in the home page title or first sentence, and in the description, where it reads naturally.
- Read it again
mttr reads the site again and says how it reads now.
An estimate made by mttr against 16 lines of work, from its home page before any script runs. It is not what any assistant says about the site. Rethink the direction with us.
Gemini cites 4 sites, not this site
mttr picked the question from sendhq.cc’s home page and asked it as a person would.
What are the best AI assistants?
Gemini
The "best" AI assistant depends entirely on what you want to use it for. The market has evolved past simple chatbots into specialized tools, workspace integrations, and autonomous agents. The top AI assistants are categorized below by their primary strengths: ---.
- 1ChatGPT (OpenAI)
- Best for Everyday tasks, brainstorming, casual conversation, and multimodal features (voice, image…
- Why it’s great It remains the most well-rounded and widely adopted conversational AI.
- 2Claude (Anthropic)
- Best for Long-form writing, software coding, and analyzing massive documents.
- Why
- 1
What the cited sites pass that it fails
Fix them from the action plan- Add real images to content3 of 3 cited sites pass it; you fail it on 75 pages.
- Show sources on guides2 of 3 cited sites pass it; you fail it on 27 pages.
- Make near-copy pages distinct2 of 3 cited sites pass it; you fail it on 1 page.