Agent View
The site as an AI agent gets it, beside the site as a person sees it. What it can read, what it has to cut away, and what it never sees.
Permit NotebookProjectsCost & TimelinesYour CityResourcesGet helpCheck my projectGet Help
PermitNotebook
About PermitNotebook
PermitNotebook answers one question for one kind of reader: does this project, in this city or county, need a building permit, and what does the local office actually say about it. We are not a government agency and we are not affiliated with any permit office.
Permit rules are local. The building code most jurisdictions start from exempts a shed under 200 square feet, so that is the number the internet repeats. In our data the real answer ranges from 36 square feet to 600, and a majority of jurisdictions publish something other than 200. That gap is the reason this site exists, and it is why every figure here is tied to a named jurisdiction rather than to a national rule of thumb.
What we have read
Verified rules
1,665
Jurisdictions
The rest of the page is in full screen.
[PermitNotebook](https://permitnotebook.com/) # About PermitNotebook PermitNotebook answers one question for one kind of reader: does this project, in this city or county, need a building permit, and what does the local office actually say about it. We are not a government agency and we are not affiliated with any permit office. Permit rules are local. The building code most jurisdictions start from exempts a shed under 200 square feet, so that is the number the internet repeats. In our data the real answer ranges from 36 square feet to 600, and a majority of jurisdictions publish something other than 200. That gap is the reason this site exists, and it is why every figure here is tied to a named jurisdiction rather than to a national rule of thumb. ## What we have read **Verified rules** 1,665 **Jurisdictions** 156 **States** 35 **Project types** 13 Latest verification 23 Oct 2026. All 1,665 rules cite the official government source they were read from, and the 1,621 that state a verdict were accepted only alongside a verbatim quotation of the sentence that settles it. Every permit page shows the date it was last checked. ## How a rule gets onto this site 1. **A researcher reads the jurisdiction's own source.** Not a contractor blog, not an SEO article, not a summary of the model code. The jurisdiction's own website, its adopted code on Municode or American Legal, or its published fee schedule. 2. **The rule is recorded with the sentence that states it.** A verdict is only accepted alongside a verbatim quotation from the page it was read on, plus the URL of that page. If a jurisdiction's exemption list is what settles the question, we quote the list so you can read it and check us. 3. **It is reviewed before it is published.** Automated checks catch fee tiers recorded as size thresholds, verdicts that contradict their own quote, and units that measure the wrong thing. A person reads whatever those checks flag. 4. **It carries its date.** Rules change. Every page states when we last checked, so you can judge how much to trust it, and so a stale figure is visible rather than hidden. The full method, including what we have deliberately not done, is on [how we verify](https://permitnotebook.com/how-we-verify/). ## What we do when we cannot verify something We publish the gap. 44 of our 1,665 rules are recorded as unverified rather than guessed, because the jurisdiction genuinely does not publish an answer. Those pages say so, name what we checked, and point you at the office to call. They are also excluded from search results, so an unanswered question cannot masquerade as an answer. The remaining 1,621 carry a verdict we can show you the source for. We would rather lose a page than fill it with a plausible number, and the same rule governs fees: where a jurisdiction publishes no fee schedule, the field stays empty instead of borrowing a neighbour's. ## Original research Some questions cannot be answered by reading a code at all, so we measure them. Three datasets on this site are computed from official open government records rather than quoted from anyone: - [How long permits actually take](https://permitnotebook.com/permit-turnaround-times/), from 128,021 real permit records. - [First-time inspection pass rates](https://permitnotebook.com/inspection-pass-rates/), from 641,062 graded inspection decisions. We could find no other public, multi-jurisdiction, residential version of this figure. - [What permits cost](https://permitnotebook.com/permit-costs/), read line by line off official fee schedules. All three are published as downloadable CSVs under a [CC BY 4.0](https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) licence, with the source and verification date on every row, so anyone can check our arithmetic or reuse the data with credit. ## Who is behind it PermitNotebook is founded, researched and edited by [Mario Bailey](https://permitnotebook.com/about/mario-bailey/). Research published under the PermitNotebook Research byline is collective work; editorial responsibility for all of it rests with the founder, as described on our [research page](https://permitnotebook.com/about/research/). **Corrections.** If a figure here is wrong, tell us and we will fix it and re-date the page. We especially want to hear from permit office staff: send the official link and we will match it. Use the [correction form](https://permitnotebook.com/report/) or [contact us](https://permitnotebook.com/contact/). **How we pay for it.** Some pages carry advertising, and some carry clearly labelled sponsored links where we may earn a fee. Neither ever influences a verdict, a threshold or a fee on this site, and the official government office is named on every page as the free path. See our [disclaimer](https://permitnotebook.com/disclaimer/) and [privacy policy](https://permitnotebook.com/privacy/). PermitNotebook is not legal advice and not code interpretation. Always confirm current requirements with the permit office before starting work.
An agent gets this page whole: its own text is in the HTML the server sends.
The figures
100 pages, set against the 168,822 sites with figures.
- Readablehigher is better
- 100%100 of 100 pages
- All 168,822 sitesBetter than 47%
Pages whose own text is in the HTML the server sends, enough of it for their kind.
- Cleanhigher is better
- 90%middle page
- All 168,822 sitesBetter than 85%
Of the words before script, the share that are the page and not menus, footer and forms.
- Costshown, never scored
- 472,305tokens
- About 4,723 a page
To read every page once. A long page that answers well is not worse for it. Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each.
How its pages spread on Clean
100 pages measured.
Against its rivals
The sites nearest it by what they do, with figures. Close means similar work, not better.
| Readinghigher is better | Costnot scored | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Readable | Clean | Tokens a page |
| permitnotebook.comThis site, 100 pages | 100% | 90% | 4,723 |
| govcodex.com100 pages | 100% | 95% | 3,268 |
| permitflow.com99 pages | 99% | None | 3,751 |
First of 3 on Readable, second on Clean.
AI crawler access
What robots.txt says to each, as read on October 23, 2026. 8 of 8 may read the site.
| Crawler | robots.txt says | Used for | The line that decides |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBotOpenAI | Not named | Training models | Falls to User-agent: * |
| OAI-SearchBotOpenAI | Not named | ChatGPT search | Falls to User-agent: * |
| ChatGPT-UserOpenAI | Not named | A page a person asks about | Falls to User-agent: * |
| ClaudeBotAnthropic | Not named | Training models | Falls to User-agent: * |
| Claude-SearchBotAnthropic | Not named | Claude’s search | Falls to User-agent: * |
| PerplexityBotPerplexity | Not named | Perplexity search | Falls to User-agent: * |
| Google-ExtendedGoogle | Not named | Training Gemini | Falls to User-agent: * |
| bingbotMicrosoft | Not named | Bing and Copilot | Falls to User-agent: * |
Every AI crawler mttr checks may read it. Not named means the rules for every crawler apply.
Every page
Worst first. Each opens in Agent View at the top.
No page loses anything an agent needs.Open the action plan
| What an agent getshigher is better | Signals | Costnot scored | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page | Words | Clean | Readable | Main heading | Tokens | What it loses |
| /arizona/mesa/permit-search | 532 | 75% | Yes | Yes | 1,177 | Nothing |
| /arizona/phoenix/permit-search | 537 | 75% | Yes | Yes | 1,188 | Nothing |
| /arizona/maricopa-county/permit-search | 558 | 76% | Yes | Yes | 1,227 | Nothing |
| /about/research | 448 | 77% | Yes | Yes | 765 | Nothing |
| /arizona/permits/solar | 947 | 79% | Yes | Yes | 1,982 | Nothing |
| /arizona/gilbert/permit-search | 720 | 80% | Yes | Yes | 1,580 | Nothing |
| / | 747 | 80% | Yes | Yes | 1,952 | Nothing |
| /arizona/pima-county/permit-search | 806 | 82% | Yes | Yes | 1,592 | Nothing |
| /about/mario-bailey | 629 | 82% | Yes | Yes | 934 | Nothing |
| /arizona/maricopa-county/solar-permit | 2,542 | 83% | Yes | Yes | 5,355 | Nothing |
| /arizona/phoenix/solar-permit | 2,486 | 83% | Yes | Yes | 5,273 | Nothing |
| /arizona/mesa/solar-permit | 2,563 | 84% | Yes | Yes | 5,414 | Nothing |
| /arizona/gilbert/solar-permit | 2,682 | 84% | Yes | Yes | 5,659 | Nothing |
| /arizona/chandler/permit-search | 959 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 1,904 | Nothing |
| /arizona/peoria/solar-permit | 2,740 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 5,857 | Nothing |
| /about | 755 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 1,258 | Nothing |
| /arizona/pima-county/solar-permit | 2,899 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 5,823 | Nothing |
| /arizona/maricopa-county | 1,179 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 2,578 | Nothing |
| /arizona/phoenix | 1,175 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 2,559 | Nothing |
| /arizona/building-without-a-permit | 1,517 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 2,894 | Nothing |
| /arizona/gilbert | 1,196 | 85% | Yes | Yes | 2,591 | Nothing |
| /arizona/chandler/solar-permit | 2,922 | 86% | Yes | Yes | 6,121 | Nothing |
| /arizona/peoria | 1,214 | 86% | Yes | Yes | 2,607 | Nothing |
| /arizona/mesa | 1,283 | 86% | Yes | Yes | 2,760 | Nothing |
| /arizona/permits/roof-replacement | 954 | 87% | Yes | Yes | 2,006 | Nothing |
Show where it stands
A card, a badge and a line, each with the figures.

A badge for the site
<a href="https://mttr.si/agent-view/permitnotebook.com"><img src="https://mttr.si/agent-view/permitnotebook.com/badge.svg" alt="Agent View: 100% readable, 90% clean" height="20"></a>
The figures in one line
permitnotebook.com in Agent View: 100% of pages readable, better than 47% of sites; 90% clean; 472,305 tokens to read all 100 pages. mttr.si/agent-view/permitnotebook.com
What to do next
Fix the pages, let an agent do it, and read the site again to see the figures move.
Fix what agents miss
No page loses anything an agent needs. The action plan has the site’s other fixes.
Open the action planConnect your agent
Claude Code, Codex or Cursor reads the site’s fixes over MCP, fixes a page in your code, has mttr read it again, and checks the fix landed.
https://mttr.si/mcpSet up an agent
Claim the site
Prove it is yours with a DNS record or a file. Your agent can then reach its reads and jobs, and set each change to wait for your approval.
Claim the siteDrawn from the HTML mttr fetched on its read of October 23, 2026, not a screenshot, and only from the 100 pages read, where the read stopped at its page limit. An assistant’s own reader may differ. Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each. A site an agent reads well is not a site an assistant cites.