Agent View
The site as an AI agent gets it, beside the site as a person sees it. What it can read, what it has to cut away, and what it never sees.
HomeReal Estate Developer Site Planning
Real Estate Developer Site Planning and Feasibility Software
Site planning software for real estate developers. Evaluate zoning, setbacks, buildable area, and selectable contour topography before you buy.
Built for Property Evaluation and Due Diligence
Most deals don't fail at closing. They fail when site constraints surface too late.
Properties get acquired blind
Without site-level data, developers commit based on assumptions about what's buildable.
Due diligence takes too long
Waiting for surveys, zoning reports, and feasibility studies delays decision-making.
The rest of the page is in full screen.
# Real Estate Developer Site Planning and Feasibility Software Site planning software for real estate developers. Evaluate zoning, setbacks, buildable area, and selectable contour topography before you buy. ## Built for Property Evaluation and Due Diligence Most deals don't fail at closing. They fail when site constraints surface too late. ### Properties get acquired blind Without site-level data, developers commit based on assumptions about what's buildable. ### Due diligence takes too long Waiting for surveys, zoning reports, and feasibility studies delays decision-making. ### Potential goes unseen Lot coverage, topography, and setback constraints aren't visible until it's too late to walk away. ## How Developers Evaluate Properties in Minutes ### 1. Load the Property Enter the address. The system loads parcel boundaries, buildings, zoning, setbacks, imagery, and USGS elevation data with selectable 1-, 2-, 5-, or 10-foot contour spacing. ### 2. Assess Development Potential See buildable area within setbacks. Review lot coverage limits, zoning constraints, and topography. Understand what can realistically be built before engaging architects or engineers. ### 3. Make Data-Driven Decisions Compare multiple properties, export professional PDFs for investor presentations, and move forward with confidence backed by real site data. ## Core Features for Real Estate Developers - Property evaluation tools - Zoning overlays - Test development scenarios - Compare properties - Investor-ready materials - Measurement tools - Professional exports - Selectable 1-, 2-, 5-, or 10-foot contour topography ## Frequently Asked Questions **Is this a design tool or an evaluation tool?** It's a property evaluation and feasibility tool designed for early due diligence, not final architectural design. **Can I use this to compare multiple properties?** Yes. Load different addresses and evaluate buildable potential, zoning constraints, and site conditions across properties. **Does this work nationwide?** Yes. Property data is available across the United States. **Can I share findings with investors?** Yes. Export professional PDFs with property data, zoning overlays, and development potential analysis for investor presentations. **Does this show lot coverage and buildable area?** Yes. The tool calculates lot coverage, displays buildable area within setbacks, and tracks impervious surface coverage to help you understand development limits. Before a single dollar of capital is committed to a land acquisition, experienced developers conduct rigorous site planning to determine whether a parcel can actually support their intended project. This process — often called **due diligence site analysis** — examines zoning classifications, [setback requirements](https://www.siteplancreator.com/setback-guide), easements, utility corridors, and topographic constraints to establish how much of a parcel is truly buildable. A site that looks promising on paper can quickly reveal serious limitations: a 2-acre lot encumbered by a 50-foot drainage easement and 25-foot perimeter setbacks may yield far less usable area than anticipated. For developers evaluating multiple sites simultaneously, a preliminary site layout helps quantify each parcel's potential before committing to surveys, environmental studies, or legal fees. If you're also exploring accessory dwelling unit potential on residential parcels, the [ADU feasibility software](https://www.siteplancreator.com/adu-feasibility-software) page covers that specific analysis in detail. ## Zoning Constraints and Buildable Area Analysis Every development project must reconcile the physical dimensions of a parcel with the regulatory envelope imposed by local zoning. Most municipalities define buildable area through a combination of **front, rear, and side setbacks**, maximum lot coverage percentages, floor area ratios (FAR), and height limits. A parcel zoned R-2 with a 35% maximum lot coverage and 20-foot setbacks on all sides will support a very different project than one zoned MU-C with 80% coverage and zero lot-line allowances. Developers must also account for: - Recorded easements (utility, drainage, access) that restrict construction - Flood zone designations under [FEMA flood mapping](https://www.fema.gov/flood-maps), which may require elevated foundations or exclude portions entirely - Impervious surface limits tied to stormwater management regulations - Parking minimums that consume significant buildable area - Overlay districts imposing additional design or density standards The [International Building Code](https://www.iccsafe.org/products-and-events/i-codes/) establishes baseline construction standards, but local zoning ordinances — not the IBC — govern land use and density. Always verify current zoning with the local planning department, as overlay amendments and interim zoning changes are common and not always reflected in online GIS portals. ## Practical Advice for Preliminary Site Layouts One of the most common mistakes developers make during due diligence is conflating gross parcel area with net developable area. A 5-acre site may yield only 2.8 acres of buildable land once you subtract wetland buffers, right-of-way dedications, required open space, and utility easements. Always calculate net area first, then apply coverage ratios and FAR to arrive at realistic program assumptions. - Sketch multiple massing scenarios — surface parking versus structured parking dramatically changes unit yield - Identify utility stub locations early; sewer and water connection points often dictate building orientation - Check for recorded plat restrictions or CC&Rs that may survive rezoning - Confirm whether the jurisdiction requires a **traffic impact analysis** threshold that your project density would trigger - Review [EPA stormwater construction permit requirements](https://www.epa.gov/npdes/stormwater-discharges-construction-activities) early — sites over 1 acre require an NPDES permit and a stormwater pollution prevention plan For projects that include structured parking or shared surface lots, reviewing standard [parking layout site plans](https://www.siteplancreator.com/parking-layout-site-plans) will help you apply correct dimensional standards for stall widths, drive aisles, and ADA-accessible space ratios before your preliminary layout is too far along to adjust efficiently.
No <main>: Wrap the page’s own content in <main>, so a reader knows where it starts and stops, and Clean can be measured.
The figures
100 pages, set against the 167,893 sites with figures and 25 in cities.
- Readablehigher is better
- 99%99 of 100 pages
- All 167,893 sitesBetter than 45%25 cities sitesBetter than 20%
Pages whose own text is in the HTML the server sends, enough of it for their kind.
- Cleanhigher is better
- Nonemiddle page
- All 167,893 sitesNo place yetWith no figure, it has no place.25 cities sitesNo place yetWith no figure, it has no place.
Of the words before script, the share that are the page and not menus, footer and forms. 100 pages are not measured, with no <main> or no words.
- Costshown, never scored
- 221,769tokens
- About 2,218 a page
To read every page once. A long page that answers well is not worse for it. Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each.
How its pages spread on Clean
0 pages measured. Not measured: 100 with no <main> or no words.
Against its rivals
The sites nearest it by what they do, with figures. Close means similar work, not better.
| Readinghigher is better | Costnot scored | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Site | Readable | Clean | Tokens a page |
| siteplancreator.comThis site, 100 pages | 99% | None | 2,218 |
| govcodex.com100 pages | 100% | 95% | 3,268 |
| permitplace.com100 pages | 97% | None | 2,284 |
| 3dlandscapearchitect.com8 pages | 88% | 94% | 540 |
Second of 4 on Readable.
AI crawler access
What robots.txt says to each, as read on October 24, 2026. 8 of 8 may read the site.
| Crawler | robots.txt says | Used for | The line that decides |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPTBotOpenAI | Allowed | Training models | User-agent: GPTBot / Allow: / |
| OAI-SearchBotOpenAI | Allowed | ChatGPT search | User-agent: OAI-SearchBot / Allow: / |
| ChatGPT-UserOpenAI | Allowed | A page a person asks about | User-agent: ChatGPT-User / Allow: / |
| ClaudeBotAnthropic | Allowed | Training models | User-agent: ClaudeBot / Allow: / |
| Claude-SearchBotAnthropic | Not named | Claude’s search | Falls to User-agent: * |
| PerplexityBotPerplexity | Allowed | Perplexity search | User-agent: PerplexityBot / Allow: / |
| Google-ExtendedGoogle | Allowed | Training Gemini | User-agent: Google-Extended / Allow: / |
| bingbotMicrosoft | Not named | Bing and Copilot | Falls to User-agent: * |
Every AI crawler mttr checks may read it. Not named means the rules for every crawler apply.
Every page
Worst first. Each opens in Agent View at the top.
100 pages of 100 lose something. Pick a loss to see what to do about it.Open the action plan
| What an agent getshigher is better | Signals | Costnot scored | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Page | Words | Clean | Readable | Main heading | Tokens | What it loses |
| /setback-guide | 59 | No <main> | No | Yes | 96 | Thin and 1 more |
| / | 865 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,458 | No <main> |
| /adu-feasibility-software | 1,069 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,959 | No <main> |
| /affiliate-program | 223 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 389 | No <main> |
| /blog | 7,179 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 14,243 | No <main> |
| /builder-site-planning-software | 994 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,867 | No <main> |
| /construction-permit-site-plans | 1,112 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 2,049 | No <main> |
| /contact-support | 33 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 46 | No <main> |
| /contractors | 884 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,638 | No <main> |
| /driveway-construction-site-plans | 977 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,783 | No <main> |
| /enterprise-contact | 26 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 45 | No <main> |
| /fence-deck-site-plans | 994 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,718 | No <main> |
| /ground-up-residential-site-planning | 1,001 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,830 | No <main> |
| /help | 151 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 254 | No <main> |
| /homeowners | 869 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,559 | No <main> |
| /how-to-make-a-site-plan | 2,042 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 3,565 | No <main> |
| /parking-layout-site-plans | 999 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,805 | No <main> |
| /pool-feasibility-software | 1,097 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,999 | No <main> |
| /pool-site-plans | 1,073 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,894 | No <main> |
| /pricing | 1,009 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,579 | No <main> |
| /privacy-policy | 25 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 40 | No <main> |
| /real-estate | 1,015 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,873 | No <main> |
| /real-estate-developer-site-planning | 831 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 1,610 | No <main> |
| /referral-program-terms | 23 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 38 | No <main> |
| /retaining-wall-site-plans | 1,176 | No <main> | Yes | Yes | 2,117 | No <main> |
Show where it stands
A card, a badge and a line, each with the figures.

A badge for the site
<a href="https://mttr.si/agent-view/siteplancreator.com"><img src="https://mttr.si/agent-view/siteplancreator.com/badge.svg" alt="Agent View: 99% readable" height="20"></a>
The figures in one line
siteplancreator.com in Agent View: 99% of pages readable, better than 20% of cities sites; Clean not measured; 221,769 tokens to read all 100 pages. mttr.si/agent-view/siteplancreator.com
What to do next
Fix the pages, let an agent do it, and read the site again to see the figures move.
Fix what agents miss
- Wrap 100 pages in <main>Clean measured
- Render the rest of 1 page on the serverReadable
Connect your agent
Claude Code, Codex or Cursor reads the site’s fixes over MCP, fixes a page in your code, has mttr read it again, and checks the fix landed.
https://mttr.si/mcpSet up an agent
Claim the site
Prove it is yours with a DNS record or a file. Your agent can then reach its reads and jobs, and set each change to wait for your approval.
Claim the siteDrawn from the HTML mttr fetched on its read of October 24, 2026, not a screenshot, and only from the 100 pages read, where the read stopped at its page limit. An assistant’s own reader may differ. Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each. A site an agent reads well is not a site an assistant cites.