Agent View

The site as an AI agent gets it, beside the site as a person sees it. What it can read, what it has to cut away, and what it never sees.

surfaced.so100 pages read on October 24, 2026
Full screen
Surfaced AI vs Profound, Peec, Otterly, Ahrefs, Semrush
surfaced.so/compare

Surfaced AIHow it worksMethodologyComparePricingHelpSign InRun Free Audit

Compare · How Surfaced fits

Surfaced AI vs the alternatives

An honest comparison of what each tool does, where each one wins, and when to pick which.

Surfaced AI is for founders who want to understand why AI engines recommend competitors instead of them, and get the exact assets to fix it. It is not a Google SEO suite, and it is not only an AI mention monitor. Here is how we score and how that compares to the alternatives founders usually consider.

If you need Google keyword rankings or an enterprise dashboard for a marketing team, buy Semrush or Profound. This is not that.

Run Free Audit

See a sample audit

Built for AI answers

The rest of the page is in full screen.

Drawn from the HTML mttr fetched, not a screenshot.
page.md217 words, about 432 tokens
Compare · How Surfaced fits

# Surfaced AI vs *the alternatives*

An honest comparison of what each tool does, where each one wins, and when to pick which.

Surfaced AI is for founders who want to understand why AI engines recommend competitors instead of them, and get the exact assets to fix it. It is not a Google SEO suite, and it is not only an AI mention monitor. Here is [how we score](https://surfaced.so/methodology) and how that compares to the alternatives founders usually consider.

If you need Google keyword rankings or an enterprise dashboard for a marketing team, buy Semrush or Profound. This is not that.

[Run Free Audit](https://surfaced.so/audit)[See a sample audit](https://surfaced.so/sample-audit)

Built for AI answers

Assistant recommendations, not Google rankings.

Fixes, not just findings

Six paste-ready assets generated from your own copy.

Single-seat by design

One founder, unlimited sites, no onboarding call.

Explainable score

32 binary checks you can reproduce by hand.

Head to head

[Surfaced AI vs ProfoundEnterprise AI-visibility analytics vs. a founder-grade audit that hands you the fixes.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-profound) [Surfaced AI vs OtterlyAI search monitoring vs. structural diagnosis with generated fixes.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-otterly) [Surfaced AI vs Peec AITeam-oriented AI analytics vs. a single-seat audit built around fixes.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-peec) [Surfaced AI vs SemrushA full SEO suite vs. a focused answer-engine audit.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-semrush) [Surfaced AI vs AhrefsBacklink and ranking authority vs. answer-engine legibility.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-ahrefs)

An agent gets this page whole: its own text is in the HTML the server sends.

The figures

100 pages, set against the 168,101 sites with figures and 649 in software. Change is since the read on October 24, 2026.

See its rivals
Readablehigher is better
100%100 of 100 pages
Same as the read before
All 168,101 sitesBetter than 47%
649 software sitesBetter than 47%

Pages whose own text is in the HTML the server sends, enough of it for their kind.

Cleanhigher is better
65%middle page
Same as the read before
All 168,101 sitesBetter than 42%
649 software sitesBetter than 31%

Of the words before script, the share that are the page and not menus, footer and forms. 2 pages are not measured, with no <main> or no words.

Costshown, never scored
53,710tokens
About 537 a page

To read every page once. A long page that answers well is not worse for it. Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each.

Readable and Clean over 4 reads

ReadableClean, middle page

Readable from 100% to 100% and Clean from 65% to 65%, between October 23, 2026 and October 24, 2026.

How its pages spread on Clean

Its middle, 65%

98 pages measured. Not measured: 2 with no <main> or no words.

Against its rivals

The sites nearest it by what they do, with figures. Close means similar work, not better.

Readinghigher is betterCostnot scored
SiteReadableCleanTokens a page
surfaced.soThis site, 100 pages100%65%537
logicballs.com100 pages100%92%4,616
rankdots.com100 pages100%99%5,814

First of 3 on Readable, third on Clean.

AI crawler access

What robots.txt says to each, as read on October 24, 2026. 8 of 8 may read the site.

Open robots.txt
Crawlerrobots.txt saysUsed forThe line that decides
GPTBotOpenAIAllowedTraining modelsUser-agent: GPTBot / Allow: /
OAI-SearchBotOpenAIAllowedChatGPT searchUser-agent: OAI-SearchBot / Allow: /
ChatGPT-UserOpenAINot namedA page a person asks aboutFalls to User-agent: *
ClaudeBotAnthropicAllowedTraining modelsUser-agent: ClaudeBot / Allow: /
Claude-SearchBotAnthropicNot namedClaude’s searchFalls to User-agent: *
PerplexityBotPerplexityAllowedPerplexity searchUser-agent: PerplexityBot / Allow: /
Google-ExtendedGoogleAllowedTraining GeminiUser-agent: Google-Extended / Allow: /
bingbotMicrosoftNot namedBing and CopilotFalls to User-agent: *

Every AI crawler mttr checks may read it. Not named means the rules for every crawler apply.

Every page

Worst first. Each opens in Agent View at the top.

2 pages of 100 lose something. Pick a loss to see what to do about it.Open the action plan

What an agent getshigher is betterSignalsCostnot scored
PageWordsCleanReadableMain headingTokensWhat it loses
/forgot-password70No <main>YesYes159No <main>
/reset-password60No <main>YesYes148No <main>
/audit2625%YesYes38Nothing
/tools11245%YesYes228Nothing
/tools/llms-txt-generator18460%YesYes302Nothing
/ai-visibility-for-builder-tools20960%YesYes379Nothing
/blog/llms-txt-guide19760%YesYes336Nothing
/help/how-often-to-audit20761%YesYes392Nothing
/help/pages-that-earn-citations21361%YesYes424Nothing
/blog/faq-schema-for-founders20461%YesYes349Nothing
/help/build-entity-profile21461%YesYes401Nothing
/help/site-speed-ai-visibility21461%YesYes428Nothing
/help/llms-txt-vs-robots-txt21862%YesYes380Nothing
/help/what-makes-content-citable22162%YesYes438Nothing
/compare/surfaced-vs-ahrefs21962%YesYes449Nothing
/help/how-the-score-is-calculated21663%YesYes411Nothing
/help/backlinks-for-ai-visibility22363%YesYes430Nothing
/help/why-my-score-changed22663%YesYes425Nothing
/ai-visibility-for-agencies22663%YesYes392Nothing
/help/ai-confuses-my-brand23663%YesYes407Nothing
/compare/surfaced-vs-peec22963%YesYes451Nothing
/compare21763%YesYes432Nothing
/help/wikipedia-and-wikidata22963%YesYes404Nothing
/help/how-ai-crawlers-discover-sites23263%YesYes450Nothing
/help/do-i-need-llms-txt23063%YesYes389Nothing
The worst 25 of 100 pages.Show all 100

Show where it stands

A card, a badge and a line, each with the figures.

surfaced.so in Agent View: 100% readable
1200 by 630, for linksDownload

A badge for the site

Agent View: 100% readable
<a href="https://mttr.si/agent-view/surfaced.so"><img src="https://mttr.si/agent-view/surfaced.so/badge.svg" alt="Agent View: 100% readable, 65% clean" height="20"></a>
Drawn again after every read

The figures in one line

surfaced.so in Agent View: 100% of pages readable, better than 47% of software sites; 65% clean; 53,710 tokens to read all 100 pages. mttr.si/agent-view/surfaced.so

What to do next

Fix the pages, let an agent do it, and read the site again to see the figures move.

Fix what agents miss

2pages lose something
  • Wrap 2 pages in <main>Clean measured
Open the action plan

Connect your agent

Claude Code, Codex or Cursor reads the site’s fixes over MCP, fixes a page in your code, has mttr read it again, and checks the fix landed.

https://mttr.si/mcp
Set up an agent

Claim the site

Prove it is yours with a DNS record or a file. Your agent can then reach its reads and jobs, and set each change to wait for your approval.

Claim the site

Drawn from the HTML mttr fetched on its read of October 24, 2026, not a screenshot, and only from the 100 pages read, where the read stopped at its page limit. An assistant’s own reader may differ. Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each. A site an agent reads well is not a site an assistant cites.

Agent Viewsurfaced.so Close Esc
Surfaced AI vs Profound, Peec, Otterly, Ahrefs, Semrush
surfaced.so/compare

Surfaced AIHow it worksMethodologyComparePricingHelpSign InRun Free Audit

Compare · How Surfaced fits

Surfaced AI vs the alternatives

An honest comparison of what each tool does, where each one wins, and when to pick which.

Surfaced AI is for founders who want to understand why AI engines recommend competitors instead of them, and get the exact assets to fix it. It is not a Google SEO suite, and it is not only an AI mention monitor. Here is how we score and how that compares to the alternatives founders usually consider.

If you need Google keyword rankings or an enterprise dashboard for a marketing team, buy Semrush or Profound. This is not that.

Run Free Audit

See a sample audit

Built for AI answers

Assistant recommendations, not Google rankings.

Fixes, not just findings

Six paste-ready assets generated from your own copy.

Single-seat by design

One founder, unlimited sites, no onboarding call.

Explainable score

32 binary checks you can reproduce by hand.

Head to head

Surfaced AI vs Profound

Enterprise AI-visibility analytics vs. a founder-grade audit that hands you the fixes.

Surfaced AI vs Otterly

AI search monitoring vs. structural diagnosis with generated fixes.

Surfaced AI vs Peec AI

Team-oriented AI analytics vs. a single-seat audit built around fixes.

Surfaced AI vs Semrush

A full SEO suite vs. a focused answer-engine audit.

Surfaced AI vs Ahrefs

Backlink and ranking authority vs. answer-engine legibility.

Your competitors are already being recommended. Catch up.

Run the audit. Decide after. Understand why AI engines recommend competitors instead of you. Free, in about two minutes. No card, no signup, no obligation.

Or browse the sample audit first

DIMITROHow it worksPricingSample auditCompareDashboardAI Crawler CheckerWebMCP Checker

Drawn from the HTML mttr fetched, not a screenshot.
page.md217 words, about 432 tokens
Compare · How Surfaced fits

# Surfaced AI vs *the alternatives*

An honest comparison of what each tool does, where each one wins, and when to pick which.

Surfaced AI is for founders who want to understand why AI engines recommend competitors instead of them, and get the exact assets to fix it. It is not a Google SEO suite, and it is not only an AI mention monitor. Here is [how we score](https://surfaced.so/methodology) and how that compares to the alternatives founders usually consider.

If you need Google keyword rankings or an enterprise dashboard for a marketing team, buy Semrush or Profound. This is not that.

[Run Free Audit](https://surfaced.so/audit)[See a sample audit](https://surfaced.so/sample-audit)

Built for AI answers

Assistant recommendations, not Google rankings.

Fixes, not just findings

Six paste-ready assets generated from your own copy.

Single-seat by design

One founder, unlimited sites, no onboarding call.

Explainable score

32 binary checks you can reproduce by hand.

Head to head

[Surfaced AI vs ProfoundEnterprise AI-visibility analytics vs. a founder-grade audit that hands you the fixes.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-profound) [Surfaced AI vs OtterlyAI search monitoring vs. structural diagnosis with generated fixes.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-otterly) [Surfaced AI vs Peec AITeam-oriented AI analytics vs. a single-seat audit built around fixes.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-peec) [Surfaced AI vs SemrushA full SEO suite vs. a focused answer-engine audit.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-semrush) [Surfaced AI vs AhrefsBacklink and ranking authority vs. answer-engine legibility.](https://surfaced.so/compare/surfaced-vs-ahrefs)
Drawn from the HTML mttr fetched, not a screenshot. An assistant’s own reader may differ.Tokens are estimated at about 4 characters each.